
The intention of this example is not to glorify the creativity of slum dwellers. To the contrary, it serves as an indication of the terrible living conditions of the majority of this world's population. Body Shop founder and human activitst Anita Roddick has stated: "(...) a short walk through the outer estates of many of the greates cities (...) betrays the hideous ugliness that we expect large groups of the world's population to live in. Often it is ugliness, that has been deliberately designed as a concrete monstrosity, using regeneration money that remains an unpaid debt long after the new batilles have crumbled away." (Simms & Smith 2008) This elloquent opinion inspires me to think that, perhaps, designers need to start designing things that are more durable, because "that which we throw away, we fail to value." (Papanek 1971)
Papanek, V. 1971. Design For The Real World. Great Britain: Paladin.
Simms, A. and Smith, J. 2008. Do Good Lives Have To Cost The Earth? London: Constable
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.